« Previous | Next »
Digg Uses Smarter Algorithm to Manage Their Community
Published on 24/01/08
by Will Pate
Kevin Rose announced that Digg recently changed their algorithm to make it harder to use a cabal of friends to get your content on the front page. If you have no idea what Digg is, it’s very popular website where users submit and vote on stories and the most voted stories make the front page.
The algorithm changed the way stories get to the front page. Now, they require more “diversity” of member votes, so a group of people can’t guarantee that their story will make the front page just because they all voted.
There’s a real problem with small cabals of people getting their content too often on the home page of Digg. About half of the front page stories are submitted by the top 100 Digg members. You only have to watch Digg for a week or two to see that groups with pet causes constantly get front page status. Look, I think Ron Paul is a sharp guy and Ubuntu Linux is really neat. But too many stories about the same subjects make reading Digg boring.
Marketers are freaking out. Some even went so far as to say that if the marketers leave Digg, it runs the risk of withering. Are you kidding? That’s absolute nonsense. Digg never needed marketers to try and use the system to get attention for their customers.
I use Digg both as a user and to share stuff that I work on, like our recent ConceptShare V2 launch. We made the front page of Digg for that story, not only because we asked our friends to vote for it. I only submit stories that I think will be interesting to the Digg community, and I took a lot of care to write the title and description in a way that would be interesting to them. Most importantly for me, I’m always transparent. Those things all add up.
It’s an open secret that Digg is for sale. I’m guessing here, but I’d venture to say that a key reason Digg hasn’t been acquired yet is their community. The Digg community is notoriously young, male and has all the charming qualities that go with being 13 and anonymous. They even had a standoff with the company (and won) over wanting to post the key to decrypt HD-DVDs, exposing Digg to considerable legal risk.
Digg needs to prove to potential acquirers that it can adapt to outsmart people gaming the system, intentionally or not. The service itself needs to encourage good behavior and discourage bad behavior, because the latter can easily ruin the experience for everyone. If that makes it a little harder for me to get a story I submit to the front page, well so be it.
That's it. What Next?
Please leave your comment so I know what you think about this article.
Comments on Digg Uses Smarter Algorithm to Manage Their Community
One Response
Jeremy L.
24/01/08
Thanks for the perspective! My initial reaction was that this new approach would discourage people from having friends with similar interests on Digg, which seems counter-productive. However, as you pointed out, the Digg community “is notoriously young, male and has all the charming qualities that go with being 13 and anonymous,” and because of that I’ve largely quit using Digg, aside from seeing a Digg badge on an article I happen to be reading. Maybe this will make Digg a bit more interesting again.
Leave a Reply